Bet the 2nd Half NBA Line: Expert Picks & Analysis


Bet the 2nd Half NBA Line: Expert Picks & Analysis

In professional basketball wagering, a specific type of bet focuses on the score achieved within only the second portion of a game. This wager requires prediction of the point total scored in the third and fourth quarters, independent of the score accumulated in the first half. For example, an oddsmaker might set a projection of 105.5 points for this particular betting line. A bettor then wagers whether the combined score of both teams in the last two quarters will be over or under that specified number.

This particular basketball wager allows for increased flexibility in predicting game outcomes. It provides an opportunity to capitalize on changes in team strategies, player performance, or game tempo that may emerge after halftime. Historically, bookmakers introduced this type of betting to offer more diverse wagering options, attracting a wider range of bettors with varying analytical approaches and risk tolerances.

The subsequent sections will delve into the statistical analysis required for informed wagers, common strategies employed by seasoned bettors, and the potential pitfalls to avoid when focusing on this type of sports gambling.

1. Halftime Adjustments

Halftime adjustments represent a critical juncture influencing the outcome of second half scoring and, consequently, the accuracy of wagers placed on the total points scored during the third and fourth quarters. Teams utilize the intermission to analyze first-half performance, strategize modifications, and address player-specific issues, directly impacting subsequent gameplay.

  • Tactical Realignment

    Coaches often revise offensive and defensive schemes based on the first half’s effectiveness. An ineffective offensive strategy may lead to alterations in play calling, player positioning, or tempo. Defensively, adjustments can include implementing double-teams, switching matchups, or altering zone formations. These tactical realignments can significantly impact scoring efficiency in the second half, either increasing or decreasing point production.

  • Personnel Substitution

    Coaches may opt to change the player lineup at the start of the third quarter or during the second half, introducing fresh players or replacing underperforming ones. This can lead to a surge in scoring if the substitutions provide a spark or create favorable matchups. Conversely, changes can also hinder offensive flow if the new lineup lacks cohesion. Consider a situation where a coach replaces a struggling point guard with a more aggressive scorer. This could elevate the team’s offensive output and consequently affect the final score.

  • Motivational Shifts

    The halftime break offers an opportunity for coaches to address the team’s mentality. A team trailing significantly might receive a motivational speech intended to ignite a renewed sense of urgency and aggression. This can translate into a higher-scoring second half as players execute with greater intensity. Conversely, a team leading comfortably might experience complacency, leading to a drop in performance and affecting the final result. Positive or Negative energy will affect overall scoring.

  • Injury Management and Reassessment

    Injuries sustained in the first half might necessitate adjustments in playing time and roles for other team members. A key player’s injury could force a team to rely more on its bench, potentially altering scoring dynamics. Additionally, teams may reassess the severity of injuries during halftime, making decisions about player availability for the remainder of the game. These changes can influence the second half score, especially when key offensive players are sidelined.

The ramifications of halftime adjustments are multi-faceted and necessitate careful consideration when assessing the potential total points of the third and fourth quarters. Understanding how these adjustments influence both team’s offensive and defensive capabilities is crucial for informed betting decisions related to that particular line.

2. Pace Fluctuations

Pace fluctuations during a professional basketball game significantly influence the final score, making them a critical factor when considering the second half wagering option. The rate at which a team executes possessions directly impacts the number of scoring opportunities available and, therefore, the total points accumulated in the third and fourth quarters.

  • Change in Offensive Tempo

    Teams may strategically alter their offensive tempo during the second half. For instance, a team leading by a comfortable margin might deliberately slow the pace to shorten the game and protect their lead, resulting in fewer possessions and potentially lower scoring. Conversely, a team trailing significantly may increase the pace, pushing the ball up the court more quickly and seeking fast-break opportunities to close the scoring gap. This adjustment in pace has a direct impact on the total points scored during that half.

  • Impact of Defensive Adjustments

    Defensive strategies implemented during the second half can dictate the pace of the game. A team adopting a full-court press or aggressive trapping scheme aims to force turnovers and generate quick scoring opportunities, often leading to an increased pace and higher scoring totals. In contrast, a team focusing on a half-court defensive set and emphasizing defensive rebounding seeks to control the tempo and limit the opponent’s possessions, potentially reducing the pace and overall scoring.

  • Influence of Foul Trouble

    The accumulation of fouls by key players can drastically alter the pace of a game. If a team’s primary ball-handlers or scorers are in foul trouble, the coach might instruct the team to play more cautiously, avoiding unnecessary fouls and slowing down the offensive flow. This often leads to a decrease in pace and potentially lower scoring. Conversely, if a team needs to generate quick points, they might employ a more aggressive style of play, risking fouls to increase the pace and offensive output.

  • Effect of Game Situation

    The game situation, such as the score differential and remaining time, exerts considerable influence on the pace. Close games in the final minutes often feature a deliberate approach, with teams carefully executing each possession and prioritizing high-percentage shots. This can lead to a slower pace and tense, low-scoring sequences. Blowout games may see teams relaxing their defensive intensity and engaging in a more up-tempo style, resulting in a faster pace and higher scoring totals. Understanding these situational dynamics is key when assessing the prospective total points.

These factors illustrate how dynamic pace fluctuations can be within a basketball game, especially in the second half. Recognizing these changes allows for a more informed prediction of the total point outcome and thus a more refined approach when considering the second half wagering option. Adjustments in pace due to offensive strategy, defensive schemes, foul trouble, and game situation must all be evaluated for an accurate assessment.

3. Fatigue Impact

Fatigue, a significant physiological and psychological factor, directly influences player performance in the latter stages of a basketball game, and consequently, the second half wagering line. The cumulative effect of physical exertion throughout the first half, combined with travel schedules and pre-existing conditions, can manifest as reduced shooting accuracy, diminished defensive intensity, and increased decision-making errors. This directly impacts a team’s ability to score and defend effectively in the third and fourth quarters. For instance, a team playing the second game of a back-to-back series may exhibit reduced energy levels, leading to fewer fast-break opportunities and lower overall scoring output in the second half. Conversely, a well-rested team facing a fatigued opponent could exploit this advantage, resulting in a higher-scoring second half.

Furthermore, the impact of fatigue is not uniform across all players. Star players, who often shoulder a disproportionate workload, may experience more pronounced performance declines as the game progresses. This can disrupt offensive flow and create vulnerabilities on defense. Understanding which players are likely to be most affected by fatigue, based on factors such as age, playing time, and injury history, is crucial for accurately predicting second-half scoring trends. Consider a scenario where a team heavily relies on a veteran player who logs extensive minutes. In the second half, this player’s fatigue-induced decline can lead to turnovers, missed shots, and defensive lapses, influencing the overall game dynamics and the second half line.

In conclusion, assessing the potential influence of fatigue is paramount when evaluating the second half wagering option. Factors such as schedule congestion, travel demands, player workload, and individual conditioning levels must be carefully considered. The differential in fatigue between opposing teams can create significant advantages or disadvantages, directly impacting scoring and ultimately determining the outcome of the bet. Recognizing and quantifying this impact improves the accuracy of predictions and informs more strategic wagering decisions, ultimately contributing to more effective analysis in professional basketball gambling.

4. Fouls Accumulation

Fouls accumulation is a pivotal factor impacting the latter stages of a professional basketball game, influencing the second half scoring and consequently, the second half wagering line. The strategic implications of players reaching foul trouble can alter game dynamics, impacting both offensive and defensive strategies. Fouls can affect roster rotations, scoring opportunities, and the overall pace of the game, all of which play a role in setting and interpreting wagering lines.

  • Star Player Fouls

    When key offensive players accrue fouls, their playing time may be curtailed to avoid disqualification, reducing their scoring impact. This can force teams to rely on less experienced players, potentially leading to offensive inefficiencies. For example, if a leading scorer picks up multiple fouls in the third quarter, the teams offensive output might diminish, influencing the under/over on the second half line.

  • Defensive Intensity Adjustment

    Teams often adjust their defensive intensity when players are in foul trouble, opting for a more conservative approach to avoid further penalties. This can lead to increased scoring opportunities for the opposing team, as defenders are less aggressive in challenging shots and contesting drives. A team with multiple players in foul trouble might concede easier baskets, potentially driving the second half score higher.

  • Free Throw Opportunities

    Fouls accumulation directly translates to free throw opportunities, which contribute significantly to the overall score. Teams in the bonus situation are awarded free throws on every subsequent foul, creating easy scoring chances. High foul counts in the second half can lead to a free throw contest, significantly increasing the total points scored and impacting the second half wagering line.

  • Rotational Changes

    Coaches frequently adjust player rotations to manage foul trouble, substituting players to prevent key contributors from fouling out. These substitutions can disrupt team chemistry and offensive flow, potentially leading to scoring droughts. The introduction of less experienced players can affect both offensive and defensive performance, impacting the total points scored in the second half.

In summary, fouls accumulation represents a crucial dynamic that shapes the second half outcome of a basketball game. The interplay between star player foul trouble, defensive adjustments, free throw opportunities, and rotational changes all contribute to the ebb and flow of scoring, which directly influences the second half line. Understanding these factors is essential for making informed wagering decisions on the total points scored in the third and fourth quarters.

5. Bench Performance

The performance of a team’s bench unit exerts a significant influence on the second-half scoring dynamics of professional basketball games, directly impacting wagering lines related to the third and fourth quarters. A productive bench can maintain or even elevate a team’s scoring output when starters are resting, while a struggling bench can lead to scoring droughts and defensive breakdowns. The effectiveness of the bench is particularly crucial in the second half, as fatigue accumulates and starters may be limited by foul trouble. For instance, a team with a deep and talented bench is better positioned to sustain its level of play throughout the game, potentially leading to consistent scoring in both halves. Conversely, a team with a weak bench may see a significant drop-off in performance when the starters are not on the court, making the second half scoring unpredictable. Consider the San Antonio Spurs during their championship runs; their consistently strong bench play allowed them to maintain high performance levels throughout games, a major factor in their success. This reliability would certainly affect wagering strategies.

Effective bench play can also shift the momentum of a game. A bench unit that provides a spark through scoring, defensive intensity, or rebounding can energize the team and change the overall trajectory of the contest. For example, a bench player who comes in and scores several quick points or makes key defensive stops can ignite a run that extends into the third or fourth quarter, dramatically altering the expected scoring. Understanding the specific strengths and weaknesses of a team’s bench unit, as well as their typical rotation patterns, is essential for accurately predicting second-half scoring. Analyzing statistics such as bench points per game, bench player efficiency ratings, and plus-minus data can provide valuable insights into the potential impact of the bench on the second-half outcome. For example, a team with a high bench points per game average is generally more likely to maintain consistent scoring throughout the entire game, including the third and fourth quarters.

In summary, bench performance is a critical component that impacts the second-half NBA line. The ability of a team’s reserves to contribute positively can greatly influence scoring, momentum, and ultimately, the outcome of the game. Accurately assessing the expected contribution of a teams bench, considering factors such as talent level, coaching strategy, and opponent matchups, enhances the precision of wagering decisions related to the second half. This understanding highlights the importance of comprehensive analysis beyond just the starting lineup when making informed bets on the third and fourth quarters of a professional basketball game. The relationship between bench performance and the second-half scoring line underscores the multifaceted nature of NBA wagering and the necessity of examining every aspect of team dynamics for successful prediction.

6. Coaching Strategy

Coaching strategy exerts a profound influence on second-half performance in professional basketball, thereby directly affecting wagering lines focused on third and fourth quarter scoring. The decisions made by coaches regarding player rotations, offensive and defensive schemes, and tactical adjustments during the halftime break and throughout the second half, act as crucial determinants of game flow and ultimate point totals. A coach’s ability to effectively analyze first-half shortcomings and implement corrective measures significantly impacts a team’s scoring potential and defensive effectiveness in the latter portion of the game. For example, a coach recognizing an opponent’s dominance in the paint during the first half may implement a double-team strategy in the second half to limit interior scoring, potentially affecting the overall point total for both teams.

Furthermore, coaching strategies related to managing player fatigue and foul trouble are pivotal in shaping second-half outcomes. Coaches must strategically allocate playing time, balancing the need for key players on the court with the risk of fatigue-induced errors or potential foul-outs. Tactical adjustments, such as switching defensive assignments or altering offensive play calls based on personnel limitations, can significantly influence scoring efficiency and pace of play. For instance, a coach may opt for a more conservative offensive approach if a star player has accumulated multiple fouls, prioritizing ball control and high-percentage shots to minimize risk. This shift in strategy directly influences the expected scoring output and necessitates careful consideration when evaluating the second-half line. The effectiveness of a team’s bench and the coach’s ability to integrate them into the game plan seamlessly are also influential factors.

In conclusion, coaching strategy is an indispensable component in assessing the second-half wagering line. A thorough understanding of a coach’s tendencies, tactical flexibility, and ability to adapt to evolving game situations is essential for accurate prediction of third and fourth quarter scoring. Failing to account for the nuanced impact of coaching decisions can lead to significant errors in wagering assessments. Thus, a comprehensive evaluation of coaching strategy forms a critical element in any informed analysis of the second-half NBA line, contributing directly to more refined and strategically sound wagering practices. The significance cannot be understated.

7. Matchup Dynamics

Matchup dynamics, referring to the specific interactions between opposing players and team compositions, significantly influence the scoring potential in the second half of a basketball game, thereby affecting the associated wagering line. The advantages or disadvantages created by these matchups can dictate offensive efficiency, defensive effectiveness, and overall game flow, all of which contribute to the point total achieved in the third and fourth quarters.

  • Individual Player Matchups

    The specific skills and tendencies of individual players in direct competition often dictate scoring opportunities and defensive effectiveness. For example, if a dominant scoring guard is consistently guarded by a less capable defender in the second half, the scoring output of that guard is likely to increase, potentially driving the total score upward. Conversely, a strong defensive specialist assigned to a high-scoring player can limit that player’s effectiveness, leading to a lower scoring output. These individual battles significantly influence the overall offensive efficiency of both teams.

  • Team Composition Matchups

    The overall composition of each team, including the balance of scoring threats, defensive specialists, and role players, creates specific advantages or disadvantages. A team with a strong inside presence might exploit a team with weaker interior defense, leading to increased scoring in the paint. Conversely, a team with multiple perimeter shooters can stretch the floor and create scoring opportunities against a team with less agile defenders. These team-level matchups impact the overall scoring potential for the second half.

  • Adjustments to Matchups

    Coaches often make strategic adjustments to player assignments and defensive schemes during halftime or throughout the second half to exploit favorable matchups or mitigate unfavorable ones. A coach might switch defenders to better contain a specific scorer or alter offensive plays to target a weak defender. These adjustments can dramatically shift the scoring balance and impact the second-half line. For instance, a team that was initially struggling to score against a specific defensive setup might implement new offensive strategies in the second half to exploit vulnerabilities, leading to an increased scoring output.

  • Impact of Fatigue on Matchups

    Fatigue can disproportionately affect certain matchups, particularly those involving players with contrasting conditioning levels or playing styles. A physically demanding defensive assignment can tire out a player, making them less effective in the later stages of the game. This creates opportunities for their opponent to exploit the fatigue-induced decline, leading to increased scoring. Therefore, evaluating the fatigue levels of key players and their potential impact on specific matchups is crucial when predicting second-half scoring.

The interplay of these matchup dynamics, from individual player battles to overall team composition and strategic adjustments, profoundly influences the potential outcomes and the wagering lines connected with the second half of professional basketball games. Recognizing and evaluating these factors enhances predictive accuracy and informs strategic decision-making when engaging in second-half wagering. These observations are directly related to analyzing “2 half nba line”.

8. Line Movement

Line movement, reflecting shifts in wagering odds, provides valuable insights into market sentiment and emerging game factors that directly influence the projection of points expected in the third and fourth quarters.

  • Public Perception and Betting Volume

    Significant shifts in the designated point total for the second half often reflect an overwhelming sentiment from the betting public. Heavy wagering on either the over or under can prompt oddsmakers to adjust the line to balance their exposure. For example, if a star player is unexpectedly ruled out at halftime, a surge of bets on the under may cause the line to decrease, reflecting an anticipated reduction in scoring. This illustrates how external information, impacting public perception, triggers adjustments in the projected line. Such adjustments directly impact wagering strategies for those focused on second-half betting.

  • Information Regarding Injuries or Roster Changes

    Real-time updates regarding player injuries or unexpected roster changes can trigger immediate and substantial line movement. News of a key defender’s injury, for example, might lead to an increase in the projected point total, signaling an expected rise in the opposing team’s scoring potential. Conversely, the unexpected return of a key offensive player could drive the line downward. These shifts, based on verifiable information, provide a critical window for informed bettors to reassess their positions relative to the adjusted second-half projection. These movements are directly coupled with expected scoring capabilities.

  • Algorithmic Adjustments and Sharp Money

    Sophisticated betting algorithms and the actions of “sharp” bettors (those with a history of successful wagering) can also drive line movement. These algorithms, constantly analyzing statistical data and game factors, can identify discrepancies between the projected point total and the perceived probability of the outcome. Large wagers placed by sharp bettors often signal undervalued opportunities, prompting oddsmakers to adjust the line accordingly. This algorithmic and professional activity reflects a constant reassessment of the expected scoring distribution within the second half, directly impacting its wagering line.

  • Game Flow and Momentum Shifts

    Unforeseen shifts in game momentum during the first half can influence expectations for the second half and trigger corresponding line movements. A team entering halftime on a significant scoring run may see an increase in the projected point total, reflecting an expectation of continued offensive success. Conversely, a team struggling to score in the first half might see the line decrease. This responsiveness to in-game dynamics underscores the fluidity of second-half wagering, requiring continuous monitoring of both game performance and associated line adjustments.

Understanding line movement, as it reflects changes in perception, information, and game dynamics, is vital for making informed wagering decisions related to scoring outcomes in the third and fourth quarters of a professional basketball game. Monitoring these shifts and understanding their underlying causes improves predictive accuracy, aligning analytical strategies with real-time market assessments focused on second-half performance and the associated betting opportunities.

9. Public Sentiment

Public sentiment, reflecting the collective beliefs and expectations of fans and bettors, plays a significant role in shaping the betting landscape surrounding the third and fourth quarters of professional basketball games. This sentiment, often driven by readily available information and emotional biases, can influence wagering patterns and contribute to fluctuations in the projected point total.

  • Influence on Betting Volume

    Prevailing public opinion directly impacts the volume of wagers placed on both the over and under for the second half line. A widespread belief that a game will be high-scoring, fueled by factors such as past performance or media narratives, can lead to a surge in bets on the over. Conversely, expectations of a defensive struggle or key player absences might drive increased betting on the under. This correlation between public sentiment and betting volume necessitates careful evaluation of whether market trends are based on sound analysis or emotional biases.

  • Exaggerated Reactions to Recent Performance

    Public sentiment often overemphasizes recent game outcomes, leading to exaggerated expectations for future performance. A team that has consistently scored well in recent second halves may be perceived as likely to continue this trend, irrespective of opponent matchups or situational factors. This recency bias can create opportunities for contrarian bettors who recognize that past performance is not always indicative of future results. Therefore, separating genuine trends from short-term fluctuations influenced by public sentiment is essential.

  • Impact of Media Narratives

    Media coverage, including pre-game analysis and commentary, significantly shapes public perception. Positive narratives surrounding a team’s offensive capabilities or strategic adjustments can amplify expectations for a high-scoring second half. Conversely, negative portrayals of a team’s defensive vulnerabilities might drive expectations for a low-scoring affair. Recognizing the influence of media narratives and their potential to skew public sentiment is crucial for unbiased analysis of wagering opportunities.

  • Contrarian Betting Opportunities

    When public sentiment becomes excessively one-sided, it can create opportunities for contrarian betting. If a vast majority of bettors are wagering on a particular outcome, the odds may shift to favor the opposite side, creating an attractive value proposition for those willing to bet against the grain. Identifying instances where public sentiment is driving irrational betting behavior requires a disciplined approach and a willingness to challenge prevailing opinions. Public sentiment is therefore a factor with a reverse and predictable reaction.

Ultimately, an understanding of the interplay between public sentiment and the wagering market is critical for making informed decisions regarding the point total of the third and fourth quarters. Analyzing how public perception shapes betting behavior, and identifying opportunities to capitalize on potential misperceptions, is an essential element of successful sports wagering. Public Sentiment helps set up 2 half nba line so it should be very important.

Frequently Asked Questions

This section addresses common inquiries regarding the nuances of wagering on the point total in the third and fourth quarters of professional basketball games.

Question 1: What is the precise definition of the “second half NBA line”?

This refers to a specific wager offered by bookmakers on the combined point total scored by both teams exclusively in the third and fourth quarters of a National Basketball Association game. It excludes points scored in the first half.

Question 2: How does the second half line differ from the full game total?

The full game total encompasses the cumulative score of all four quarters and any overtime periods. The second half wager focuses solely on the point production after halftime, allowing for a more targeted prediction based on evolving game dynamics.

Question 3: What factors should one consider when wagering on the second half line?

Halftime adjustments, pace of play fluctuations, player fatigue, foul accumulation, bench performance, coaching strategies, and matchup dynamics all warrant careful evaluation. Examining these factors provides insights into the potential scoring trends of the third and fourth quarters.

Question 4: How do injuries impact the second half line?

Injuries to key offensive or defensive players can significantly alter scoring expectations. An injury to a primary scorer may lead to a decrease in the projected point total, while an injury to a key defender could result in an increase.

Question 5: Does public sentiment influence the second half NBA line?

Yes, widespread public opinion can impact betting volume and, consequently, line movement. However, it is crucial to distinguish between informed analysis and emotionally driven biases when assessing the validity of public sentiment.

Question 6: How can I access historical data related to second half scoring?

Numerous sports statistics websites and data providers offer detailed information on team and player performance, including second-half scoring averages and trends. Accessing this data is vital for informed wagering decisions.

The second half NBA line offers a distinct and dynamic wagering opportunity. It is an aspect of the game that can be successfully evaluated when properly studied and understood.

The following section will delve into strategies for advanced analysis in the next part of this article series.

Tips for Analyzing the Second Half NBA Line

This section provides actionable insights for analyzing and wagering on the point total in the third and fourth quarters of professional basketball games. Effective evaluation enhances the likelihood of informed betting decisions.

Tip 1: Analyze First Half Adjustments:

Carefully assess the tactical alterations made by both teams during halftime. Review press conferences, coach interviews, and statistical indicators to identify potential changes in offensive schemes, defensive strategies, and player rotations. Understanding these modifications is crucial for forecasting second half performance.

Tip 2: Monitor Key Player Fatigue Levels:

Track the minutes played by key players in the first half and assess their potential susceptibility to fatigue. A player logging excessive minutes or exhibiting signs of physical wear may experience a decline in effectiveness during the third and fourth quarters, influencing the scoring outcome. Evaluate the likely effect on team totals.

Tip 3: Assess Foul Trouble Implications:

Scrutinize the foul counts of key players and evaluate the potential impact on their playing time and defensive aggression. Significant foul trouble for a primary scorer or defender can drastically alter game dynamics, impacting both offensive output and defensive efficiency. These changes require evaluation.

Tip 4: Evaluate Bench Performance:

Analyze the performance of each team’s bench unit. A productive bench can sustain scoring momentum when starters are resting, while a struggling bench can lead to scoring droughts. Bench performance directly influences the second half point total.

Tip 5: Recognize Momentum Shifts:

Identify potential shifts in momentum during the first half. Teams entering halftime on a significant scoring run are often more likely to maintain a high scoring pace in the third quarter. Conversely, a team struggling to score may experience continued difficulty. The trend can continue.

Tip 6: Follow Line Movement Closely:

Monitor changes in the betting line for the second half point total. Significant line movement can reflect emerging information or shifting public sentiment. However, be cautious of overreacting to line movement without conducting independent analysis. Review and reconcile.

Tip 7: Consider Head-to-Head Matchups:

Focus on the specific matchups between key players and their potential impact on scoring. A dominant offensive player facing a weaker defender is likely to generate more scoring opportunities. Conversely, a strong defensive player can limit the effectiveness of a key scorer. This requires specific knowledge.

The application of these strategies facilitates a more comprehensive assessment of factors influencing the point total in the third and fourth quarters. Prudent analysis improves the likelihood of making informed wagering decisions.

In conclusion, applying these steps will help determine the best course of action and understanding the second half NBA line. The following section will provide concluding remarks.

Conclusion

The preceding exploration of the “2 half nba line” has underscored its multifaceted nature. Success in wagering on this specific line requires a comprehensive understanding of halftime adjustments, pace dynamics, player fatigue, foul implications, bench contributions, coaching strategies, and matchup differentials. A reliance solely on superficial observations proves insufficient.

Continued analytical rigor remains paramount. Bettors are encouraged to refine their methodologies, incorporating real-time data and objective assessments to navigate the inherent complexities of this wagering option. The pursuit of informed decision-making remains the cornerstone of responsible and potentially profitable engagement with the “2 half nba line.”