Online discussions about the existence of a higher power are prevalent on social media platforms. These conversations often involve users sharing personal beliefs, philosophical arguments, and interpretations of religious texts within communities dedicated to the topic. The platform provides a space for individuals to explore complex theological questions and engage with diverse perspectives.
The significance of these online dialogues lies in their accessibility and potential for fostering open-mindedness. They offer a contemporary outlet for exploring age-old questions about faith, reason, and spirituality. Historically, such debates were confined to academic or religious institutions, but the internet has democratized access to diverse viewpoints and allowed a broader segment of the population to participate. This democratization offers opportunities for individuals to solidify their own beliefs through reasoned discourse, or to re-evaluate them in light of new information and experiences shared by others.
The following sections will delve into the types of arguments typically presented in these online forums, analyze the potential impact of these discussions on individuals’ belief systems, and consider the challenges inherent in navigating such complex and potentially sensitive topics in an online environment. The analysis will also explore the role of community moderation and the prevalence of biases within these specific online ecosystems.
1. Community Beliefs
The prevailing beliefs within a “Reddit” community significantly shape the nature and direction of discussions concerning the existence of a higher power. Communities, often organized around shared interests or ideologies, develop distinct cultures and norms regarding acceptable viewpoints. A subreddit predominantly populated by atheists, for example, tends to feature skepticism and critical analysis of theistic arguments. Conversely, a community dedicated to a specific religion fosters affirmations of faith and shared spiritual experiences. The overall tone and the types of arguments deemed persuasive are directly influenced by these pre-existing community beliefs.
The importance of community beliefs within such online forums cannot be overstated. They function as a filter, determining which viewpoints are amplified and which are marginalized. Individuals seeking to engage in these discussions often subconsciously adjust their language and arguments to align with the perceived norms of the group. This can lead to echo chambers, where dissenting opinions are suppressed or ignored, reinforcing existing beliefs and potentially hindering genuine dialogue. Real-world examples include subreddits dedicated to specific religions where expressions of doubt are often met with disapproval, and atheist-oriented subreddits where theistic arguments are frequently subjected to intense scrutiny. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately assessing the diversity and representativeness of opinions expressed on the platform.
In summary, community beliefs act as a powerful contextual force within the “Reddit” ecosystem. They impact the range of viewpoints expressed, the reception of different arguments, and the overall trajectory of discussions surrounding belief in a higher power. While online platforms can offer a space for diverse opinions, pre-existing community beliefs can create inherent biases that must be acknowledged when analyzing the platform’s impact on individual perspectives. Addressing this challenge requires critical engagement with the content and an awareness of the potential for echo chambers to limit the scope of the debate.
2. Atheism Prevalence
The prevalence of atheism within online communities such as “Reddit” directly influences the nature of discourse surrounding belief. Higher concentrations of atheistic users often correlate with increased skepticism, critical analysis of religious claims, and a greater emphasis on scientific reasoning and empirical evidence within discussions concerning the existence of a higher power. This demographic presence shapes the types of arguments presented, the level of scrutiny applied to those arguments, and the overall tone of the conversation. The prominence of atheistic perspectives on the platform, compared to some other online spaces, makes it a notable venue for exploring the challenges and justifications for theistic beliefs.
The presence of a significant atheistic community on “Reddit” fosters a distinctive environment where the burden of proof often rests on those advocating for the existence of a deity. Arguments from religious texts, tradition, or personal experience may face rigorous challenges based on logical fallacies, lack of empirical support, or conflicting interpretations. Real-world examples include subreddits dedicated to philosophical debates about religion, where atheistic users frequently engage in detailed critiques of common theistic arguments such as the cosmological argument or the argument from design. The prevalence of atheism necessitates that individuals presenting theistic viewpoints engage with sophisticated counterarguments and provide well-reasoned defenses of their positions. This dynamic can lead to more nuanced and informed discussions, but also can create an adversarial environment.
In summary, the elevated prevalence of atheism on “Reddit” functions as a catalyst for critical examination of belief. The associated emphasis on evidence-based reasoning, logical analysis, and scrutiny of traditional arguments contributes to a unique discourse environment. Although the presence of a strong atheistic voice promotes intellectual rigor, it also carries the risk of creating echo chambers and potentially alienating individuals with theistic beliefs. Recognizing this dynamic is essential for fostering constructive dialogue and ensuring that diverse perspectives are fairly represented within the online community.
3. Theism Representation
The representation of theism within online platforms, particularly on “Reddit,” is crucial for understanding the diversity and dynamics of religious discussions. The extent to which theistic viewpoints are present, accurately portrayed, and actively engaged with shapes the overall discourse on the existence and nature of a higher power.
-
Diversity of Denominations
The representation of theism on platforms like “Reddit” encompasses a wide spectrum of denominations and theological perspectives. Major world religions such as Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism are often represented, along with various sects and branches within each religion. The diversity of these representations impacts the range of arguments presented, the interpretations of religious texts discussed, and the types of spiritual experiences shared. For example, a discussion on the nature of prayer might feature differing viewpoints from Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Christians, each drawing on their specific theological traditions and practices.
-
Engagement with Skepticism
Theistic representation on “Reddit” frequently involves engagement with skeptical arguments and criticisms from atheists and agnostics. Theists participating in these discussions are often compelled to defend their beliefs against challenges to the logical consistency of religious doctrines, the problem of evil, and the lack of empirical evidence for the existence of a higher power. This engagement can lead to more nuanced and sophisticated articulations of theistic viewpoints, as individuals are forced to confront and address these challenges. Real-world examples include debates on the validity of miracles or the historical accuracy of religious texts.
-
Personal Testimony and Shared Experiences
A significant aspect of theistic representation involves the sharing of personal testimonies and spiritual experiences. Individuals often recount how their faith has impacted their lives, provided them with comfort and meaning, or guided them through difficult times. These narratives can be powerful and persuasive for some, while others may view them as subjective and anecdotal. The prevalence of personal testimonies highlights the emotional and experiential dimensions of religious belief, which often complement or transcend purely rational arguments. For instance, accounts of overcoming adversity through faith may resonate with individuals seeking solace or inspiration.
-
Apologetics and Defense of Faith
Theistic representation on “Reddit” also includes apologetics, which involves the reasoned defense of religious beliefs. Apologists present arguments for the existence of God, address criticisms of religious doctrines, and seek to demonstrate the compatibility of faith with reason and science. These arguments often draw on philosophical, theological, and scientific sources, aiming to provide a rational basis for religious belief. Real-world examples include discussions on the fine-tuning argument for the existence of God or attempts to reconcile evolutionary biology with religious creation narratives.
In conclusion, the nature and quality of theistic representation on “Reddit” profoundly influence the tenor of discussions about the existence of a higher power. The diversity of denominations, the engagement with skepticism, the sharing of personal testimonies, and the practice of apologetics all contribute to a complex and multifaceted discourse. By examining these elements, it becomes possible to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the role of faith in online communities and the ways in which individuals negotiate their beliefs in a digital age.
4. Agnosticism Voices
The articulation of agnostic perspectives on “Reddit” provides a critical dimension to the platform’s dialogues concerning belief. Agnosticism, characterized by the stance that the existence or non-existence of a deity is unknowable, offers a nuanced position that frequently challenges both theistic assertions and atheistic denials. The presence and character of agnostic voices shape the overall intellectual climate and contribute to a more complex understanding of faith and doubt.
-
Epistemological Humility
Agnostic perspectives often emphasize epistemological humility, asserting the limits of human knowledge and understanding, particularly in relation to metaphysical claims. This stance challenges the certainty often expressed by both theists and atheists, advocating for a more cautious and tentative approach to questions of ultimate reality. On “Reddit,” agnostic users might question the validity of arguments from religious experience or the conclusiveness of scientific evidence cited to disprove the existence of a deity. This emphasis on epistemic limitations can temper the intensity of debates and encourage more measured discussions.
-
Emphasis on Reason and Evidence
While agnosticism acknowledges the limits of knowledge, it also typically champions the importance of reason and evidence in forming beliefs. Agnostic voices on “Reddit” often scrutinize the logical coherence of religious doctrines and the empirical support for supernatural claims. They may engage in critical analysis of religious texts, historical accounts, and philosophical arguments, demanding a high standard of evidence before accepting any belief as true. This emphasis on reason and evidence aligns agnosticism with a scientific worldview and can serve as a bridge between atheistic skepticism and theistic faith.
-
Exploration of Meaning and Purpose
Agnostic individuals frequently grapple with questions of meaning and purpose in life, even without relying on traditional religious frameworks. On “Reddit,” agnostic users might explore secular ethics, humanistic values, and existentialist philosophies as alternative sources of meaning and guidance. They may engage in discussions about morality, social justice, and personal fulfillment, seeking to create a meaningful life grounded in human relationships and rational principles. This exploration of meaning and purpose demonstrates that agnosticism is not simply a passive stance of unknowing but an active engagement with fundamental questions about human existence.
-
Mediation Between Theism and Atheism
The agnostic perspective often serves as a mediating force within the polarized landscape of religious debate on “Reddit.” Agnostic users can offer a neutral ground for dialogue, acknowledging the validity of both theistic and atheistic concerns while advocating for a more nuanced and open-minded approach. They might challenge the rigid dogmatism of some religious believers while also criticizing the dismissive attitudes of some atheists. This mediating role can foster greater understanding and empathy between opposing viewpoints, creating a more constructive environment for discussing sensitive and complex issues.
In summary, agnostic voices on “Reddit” play a vital role in shaping the discourse surrounding belief. By emphasizing epistemological humility, prioritizing reason and evidence, exploring alternative sources of meaning, and mediating between opposing viewpoints, agnosticism contributes to a more thoughtful and inclusive conversation. Recognizing the significance of these voices is essential for understanding the full spectrum of perspectives present on the platform and for fostering more productive dialogues about faith, doubt, and the search for meaning in a complex world.
5. Personal Testimony
Personal testimony, a narrative account of an individual’s experience, holds a significant position within the online discourse concerning belief on “Reddit”. These accounts, often detailing transformative events, spiritual encounters, or journeys of faith (or a loss thereof), contribute to the multifaceted exploration of the existence of a higher power.
-
Evidential Value
The evidential value of personal testimony is a recurring point of contention within these discussions. Proponents argue that such narratives provide compelling subjective evidence supporting the reality of religious experiences and the existence of a deity. Conversely, skeptics often highlight the limitations of anecdotal evidence, citing potential biases, psychological factors, and the lack of objective verification. The impact of personal testimony, therefore, is often contingent on the individual’s prior beliefs and the perceived credibility of the narrator.
-
Emotional Resonance
Personal testimonies often carry a strong emotional weight, capable of resonating deeply with individuals seeking meaning, comfort, or guidance. These narratives can evoke empathy and create a sense of connection, particularly among those who share similar experiences or are searching for answers to existential questions. However, the emotional power of personal testimony can also be exploited, potentially swaying individuals based on sentiment rather than reasoned analysis. The presence of persuasive personal accounts can significantly influence the overall tone and direction of belief-related discussions.
-
Diversity of Experiences
The aggregation of personal testimonies on platforms like “Reddit” showcases the diversity of religious and spiritual experiences across different cultures, denominations, and personal backgrounds. This exposure to a wide range of narratives can broaden perspectives, challenge preconceived notions, and foster a greater understanding of the multifaceted nature of belief. However, the sheer volume and variety of testimonies can also be overwhelming, potentially leading to confusion or a sense of relativism, where all beliefs are perceived as equally valid regardless of their logical consistency or empirical support.
-
Counter-Testimonies and Deconversion Narratives
Alongside accounts affirming faith, “Reddit” also features counter-testimonies and deconversion narratives, detailing individuals’ experiences of losing faith or abandoning religious beliefs. These narratives often explore the reasons behind their shift in perspective, highlighting intellectual doubts, negative experiences with religious institutions, or a growing reliance on secular reasoning. The presence of these counter-narratives contributes to a more balanced and critical examination of belief, challenging the assumption that faith is inherently beneficial or universally valid.
The utilization and interpretation of personal testimony within the online forum dedicated to belief reflect broader epistemological and psychological dynamics. The subjective nature of these narratives and their capacity to evoke strong emotional responses necessitates a critical approach, recognizing both their potential value and inherent limitations within the larger search for understanding related to “do you believe in god reddit”.
6. Philosophical Debate
The exploration of belief on “Reddit” frequently manifests as philosophical debate, an integral component of the platform’s engagement with the question of the existence of a higher power. These debates encompass a wide array of arguments, spanning metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and logic. The presence of structured philosophical reasoning directly influences the sophistication and rigor of the discussions. For example, arguments from contingency, first cause arguments, and ontological arguments are often dissected and debated, utilizing established philosophical frameworks. The engagement with these arguments can shape individual understanding and potentially influence shifts in belief, either strengthening existing convictions or prompting reconsideration.
The impact of philosophical debate on “Reddit” is further amplified by the platform’s capacity to disseminate complex ideas to a broad audience. Users, irrespective of their formal philosophical training, can access and engage with nuanced arguments, thereby fostering a more informed and critical approach to belief. Real-world examples include lengthy threads dedicated to dissecting the problem of evil, exploring the implications of free will, or analyzing the coherence of specific religious doctrines. However, the open nature of the platform also presents challenges. Philosophical debates can devolve into unproductive arguments, characterized by logical fallacies, misrepresentations of opposing viewpoints, and a lack of intellectual humility. Moderation and community norms play a crucial role in mitigating these challenges and fostering a more conducive environment for reasoned discourse. The philosophical debate is essential for individuals to understand their beliefs, supported by the argument such as cosmological argument or ontological argument.
In summary, philosophical debate constitutes a core element of belief-related discussions on “Reddit”. It functions as a catalyst for intellectual exploration, promoting critical thinking and informed engagement with complex theological and metaphysical concepts. While the potential for unproductive or misinformed arguments exists, the overall contribution of philosophical debate to the quality and depth of these online conversations is undeniable. Understanding the dynamics of these debates, including the types of arguments presented, the challenges encountered, and the role of community moderation, is crucial for effectively navigating the complexities of belief on online platforms and how the belief is affected by “do you believe in god reddit”.
7. Argument Quality
The quality of arguments presented within “Reddit” discussions concerning belief directly influences the persuasiveness and impact of those discussions on individuals’ perspectives. A higher standard of argumentation, characterized by logical coherence, factual accuracy, and reasoned analysis, contributes to more informed and productive dialogues regarding the existence of a higher power.
-
Logical Validity
The logical validity of arguments is a fundamental aspect of argument quality. Arguments that commit logical fallacies, such as ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, or appeals to emotion, are inherently weaker and less persuasive. Within the context of “Reddit” discussions, arguments must be logically sound, with premises that genuinely support the conclusion being drawn. For instance, a cosmological argument that relies on a flawed understanding of causality or a religious argument that misrepresents scientific principles is likely to be deemed of poor quality and ineffective in convincing skeptical individuals. The presence of logically valid arguments raises the intellectual rigor of the discourse.
-
Evidential Support
The extent to which arguments are supported by credible evidence is a critical determinant of their quality. Claims presented without sufficient evidence or reliant on unsubstantiated assertions are generally considered less compelling. In the context of “Reddit,” arguments for or against the existence of a higher power must be grounded in reliable data, scholarly research, or well-established philosophical principles. For example, arguments from religious texts should be accompanied by careful exegesis and contextual analysis, while scientific arguments should be based on peer-reviewed studies and established scientific theories. The utilization of strong evidential support strengthens the overall argument.
-
Consideration of Counterarguments
The quality of an argument is enhanced when it acknowledges and addresses potential counterarguments. A well-reasoned argument anticipates objections, offers rebuttals, and demonstrates an awareness of alternative perspectives. Within “Reddit” discussions, arguments concerning belief should engage with opposing viewpoints and offer substantive responses to criticisms. For example, a theistic argument that addresses the problem of evil or an atheistic argument that acknowledges the emotional appeal of religion demonstrates a higher level of intellectual honesty and persuasiveness. Engaging with other points of view increases the overall quality.
-
Clarity and Precision
The clarity and precision with which arguments are presented directly affect their accessibility and impact. Arguments that are vague, ambiguous, or overly complex are less likely to be understood or appreciated by a diverse audience. In the context of “Reddit,” arguments should be articulated in a clear, concise, and accessible manner, avoiding jargon or technical terms that may alienate some users. Precise definitions of key terms and a well-structured presentation of ideas contribute to the overall quality and effectiveness of the argument. The ability for all individuals to clearly understand arguments increase quality of argument.
The collective impact of argument quality on “Reddit” discussions about belief is substantial. A greater emphasis on logical validity, evidential support, consideration of counterarguments, and clarity promotes more informed, productive, and respectful dialogues. This ultimately contributes to a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the complex questions surrounding the existence of a higher power. The presence of these factors can influence individuals and their belief systems when exploring this topic.
8. Influence Factors
Discussions regarding the existence of a deity on online forums, like those found on “Reddit,” are subject to a complex interplay of influence factors. These factors, encompassing individual psychology, social dynamics, and the platform’s design, collectively shape the discourse and impact individual beliefs. A primary influence is confirmation bias, wherein individuals selectively seek out information confirming pre-existing beliefs, thereby reinforcing their current perspectives. This tendency is amplified within echo chambers, online communities where dissenting opinions are minimized, leading to an overestimation of the prevalence and validity of one’s own views. Examples include religious subreddits where dissenting views may be downvoted or actively discouraged, solidifying the dominant perspective. Furthermore, the anonymity afforded by online platforms can embolden users to express extreme viewpoints or engage in aggressive rhetoric, potentially polarizing the discussion and discouraging nuanced engagement.
The platform’s design also exerts considerable influence. Algorithmic filtering, designed to maximize user engagement, can inadvertently create filter bubbles, exposing individuals primarily to content aligned with their past behavior. This selective exposure can limit exposure to diverse perspectives and contribute to a skewed understanding of the broader debate surrounding belief. Moreover, the structure of “Reddit,” with its upvote/downvote system, can incentivize conformity and discourage unpopular opinions. Content that aligns with the dominant viewpoint is more likely to be upvoted and promoted, while dissenting voices may be silenced or marginalized. A practical understanding of these influence factors is crucial for evaluating the validity and representativeness of opinions expressed on the platform. Researchers and individuals seeking to understand the dynamics of belief should consider the potential biases introduced by these factors when interpreting online discussions.
In conclusion, the interplay of individual psychology, social dynamics, and platform design significantly shapes the discourse surrounding belief on “Reddit.” Confirmation bias, echo chambers, algorithmic filtering, and the upvote/downvote system all contribute to a complex ecosystem where influence factors can distort perceptions and reinforce existing beliefs. Recognizing these influences is essential for navigating the complexities of online discussions and fostering a more critical and informed understanding of the diverse perspectives on faith and doubt, and its connection with “do you believe in god reddit”. Addressing these challenges requires conscious effort to seek out diverse viewpoints, engage in respectful dialogue, and critically evaluate the information encountered online.
Frequently Asked Questions about Belief Discussions on Reddit
The following section addresses common inquiries regarding online discussions concerning the existence of a higher power on the “Reddit” platform. These questions aim to provide clarity on the dynamics, influences, and potential impacts of these discussions.
Question 1: What types of arguments are typically presented in these online forums?
Discussions encompass a broad range of arguments, including philosophical arguments (e.g., cosmological, ontological, teleological), scientific arguments (e.g., arguments from fine-tuning, arguments from evolutionary biology), personal testimonies, and interpretations of religious texts. The specific arguments presented vary depending on the community and the individuals participating.
Question 2: How might participating in these discussions affect an individual’s belief system?
Engagement can either strengthen or alter existing beliefs. Exposure to diverse viewpoints and reasoned arguments may lead individuals to re-evaluate their convictions, refine their understanding, or even shift their perspectives. Conversely, confirmation bias and echo chambers can reinforce pre-existing beliefs.
Question 3: What are the challenges inherent in navigating discussions about belief in an online environment?
Challenges include the potential for unproductive arguments, logical fallacies, misrepresentations of opposing viewpoints, the spread of misinformation, and the polarization of opinions. The anonymity afforded by online platforms can also contribute to aggressive or disrespectful communication.
Question 4: How does community moderation influence the nature of these discussions?
Community moderation plays a crucial role in shaping the tone and direction of discussions. Effective moderation can promote respectful dialogue, remove offensive content, and enforce community guidelines. However, biased or inconsistent moderation can stifle dissenting opinions and create an uneven playing field.
Question 5: Are the opinions expressed on “Reddit” representative of broader societal views on belief?
Opinions expressed may not be fully representative of broader societal views. “Reddit” demographics skew towards younger, more educated, and more technologically savvy individuals, which may influence the prevalence of certain viewpoints (e.g., atheism, agnosticism). Additionally, echo chambers can further distort the perception of societal consensus.
Question 6: What strategies can individuals employ to engage more constructively in these online discussions?
Strategies include actively seeking out diverse viewpoints, engaging respectfully with opposing arguments, avoiding logical fallacies, supporting claims with credible evidence, and recognizing the potential for personal biases. Practicing intellectual humility and maintaining an open mind are also essential.
In summary, navigating discussions about belief on “Reddit” requires a critical and discerning approach. Recognizing the influence factors, challenges, and potential biases is crucial for fostering informed and productive dialogues. It’s also important to remember the “do you believe in god reddit” is only a small portion of the discussion available.
The following section will explore strategies for fostering more productive and respectful dialogues about belief within online communities.
Navigating Discussions About Belief
Online forums dedicated to the question of belief require careful engagement to foster constructive dialogue. The following tips outline strategies for enhancing the quality and civility of such discussions, particularly when encountering diverse perspectives regarding, “do you believe in god reddit.”
Tip 1: Prioritize Clarity and Precision in Communication. Articulate arguments with precision, avoiding ambiguity or jargon that may hinder understanding. Clearly define key terms and concepts to ensure a shared foundation for discussion. For example, when discussing the cosmological argument, explicitly define terms like “contingency” and “necessary being” to avoid misinterpretations.
Tip 2: Adhere to Logical Principles and Avoid Fallacies. Scrutinize arguments for logical validity, identifying and avoiding common fallacies such as ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and appeals to emotion. A reasoned and logical approach is essential for productive dialogue. For instance, refrain from attacking the character of an individual presenting a theistic argument and instead address the substance of their argument.
Tip 3: Support Claims with Credible Evidence. Ground assertions in reliable data, scholarly research, or well-established philosophical principles. Provide citations or references to support claims, enhancing the credibility of the argument. When referencing religious texts, offer careful exegesis and contextual analysis to avoid misinterpretations. Refrain from making unsubstantiated claims.
Tip 4: Actively Seek and Acknowledge Diverse Viewpoints. Make a conscious effort to engage with perspectives that differ from one’s own. Acknowledge the validity of opposing arguments, even if one ultimately disagrees with them. This demonstrates intellectual humility and fosters a more respectful environment for dialogue. Actively seek the opposing viewpoint, allowing each person to understand each other.
Tip 5: Practice Intellectual Humility and Open-Mindedness. Recognize the limits of one’s own knowledge and understanding, acknowledging the possibility that one’s current beliefs may be incomplete or inaccurate. Maintain an open mind and be willing to consider alternative perspectives. The search for knowledge is never-ending.
Tip 6: Respond Respectfully and Avoid Personal Attacks. Engage in discussions with civility and respect, even when disagreeing with another’s viewpoint. Refrain from personal attacks, insults, or inflammatory language. Focus on the substance of the argument rather than the character of the individual presenting it.
Tip 7: Be Mindful of Biases and Assumptions. Acknowledge the potential influence of personal biases and assumptions on one’s interpretation of evidence and arguments. Strive to identify and mitigate these biases to ensure a more objective and balanced assessment of the issues at hand.
The key takeaways from these tips emphasize the importance of reasoned discourse, intellectual humility, and respectful engagement. By adhering to these guidelines, individuals can contribute to more productive and meaningful discussions. Understanding those factors can affect the “do you believe in god reddit” conversations online.
The article will now provide a concluding summary and reflection.
Concluding Remarks on Belief Discussions
The exploration of belief within online forums, exemplified by “do you believe in god reddit,” reveals a multifaceted landscape of theological, philosophical, and personal perspectives. The dynamics are shaped by community norms, individual biases, and the design of the platform itself. The quality of arguments, the presence of diverse viewpoints, and the influence of moderation policies all contribute to the tenor and impact of these discussions. The presence of differing beliefs affect others on “do you believe in god reddit.”
Continued critical engagement with online dialogues concerning belief remains essential. Understanding the potential for echo chambers, the influence of algorithms, and the importance of respectful communication is paramount for fostering a more informed and nuanced understanding of the complexities of faith, doubt, and the enduring human quest for meaning. This article is informative to understand more information about do you believe in god reddit.
